Elon Musk is facing yet another lawsuit regarding the $1 million voter lottery run by his political action committee America PAC. It seems that in defending himself against the first lawsuit, he provided fuel for a second one.
Filed to a Texas District Court by an Arizona resident on Tuesday, the new 14-page class action lawsuit accuses Musk and America PAC of fraud and breach of contract relating to the $1 million giveaway launched last month.
SEE ALSO: Judge refuses to stop Elon Musk’s million dollar election 'sweepstakes'Open to registered voters in the seven swing states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and North Carolina, Musk's $1 million daily giveaway required participants to provide their personal information and sign a petition supporting the First and Second Amendments. Musk and America PAC offered $47 to each signatory "in appreciation for [their] support," and stated that those who signed would also go into a random draw to win $1 million, with a new winner chosen each day from Oct. 19.
Tuesday's class action now claims that the selection of $1 million winners wasn't random at all, and that Musk and America PAC falsely stated it was in order to entice people to sign their petition.
The case specifically references statements made in a previous case concerning Musk's giveaway brought by Philadelphia's district attorney Larry Krasner. In said case, Krasner accused Musk and America PAC of running an illegal lottery, attempting to influence voters, and violating consumer protection laws by making "deceptive, vague or misleading statements."
Of course, Musk denied such allegations. The defense claimed that the apparent lottery winners were in fact America PAC spokespeople, and that the ostensible $1 million winnings were actually paychecks. Further, each recipient was chosen based on their personal stories, and signed contracts with America PAC.
"The $1 million recipients are not chosen by chance," said Musk's lawyer Chris Gober. "We know exactly who will be announced as the $1 million recipient today and tomorrow."
A judge ruled in favour of Musk on Monday, deciding that the $1 million America PAC giveaway could continue. Even so, the judgment initially appeared to have little material impact considering that the lottery was scheduled to end on Election Day regardless.
However, Musk and America PAC's defense in said case directly contradicted their public claims that the winners of the $1 million giveaway would be chosen at random, sparking this new class action lawsuit just one day later.
"Defendants’ statements indicating that individuals who signed the petition would be chosen at random to win $1,000,000 were false, and Defendants knew those statements were false at the time they were made," read the class action suit.
"Had Plaintiff been aware that she had no chance of receiving $1,000,000, she would not have signed or supported the America PAC petition and would not have provided her [personal identifying information] to Defendants."
In addition to at least $5 million in damages, the lawsuit is requesting the destruction of all personal identifying information that Musk and America PAC collected from those who entered the supposed giveaway. Participants were required to provide their first and last names, email address, postal address, and phone number as a condition of entering the alleged lottery.
The lawsuit claims that Musk has profited off this supposed giveaway by driving traffic to his social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter), and that he can now profit further by using or selling participants' personal information. Musk and America PAC largely failed to state how signatories' personal information would be used or stored, the form merely noting that phone numbers specifically "will only be used to confirm you are the legitimate petition signer."
"[The plaintiffs] having now discovered no legitimate lottery existed, and that they provided their personal identifying information to Defendants for nothing in exchange, now demand Defendant be enjoined from using the data or otherwise providing it to third parties," the complaint states.
An NBC News report published last week found that of the $1 million lottery's first 14 winners, nine were registered Republicans. Of the remaining five, three had publicly voiced support for Republican candidate Donald Trump, and one had described himself as a former Democrat. Not a single one of the winners were registered Democrats or visible supporters of Democratic candidate Kamala Harris.
Musk himself is a vocal Trump supporter as well, though he has previously refuted allegations that he's using monetary incentives to register Republicans. The billionaire claimed that anyone who signed the petition had "a daily chance of winning" $1 million, and that they "can be from any or no political party."
It might be technically true that supporters of any political party could sign the petition for a "chance" at the $1 million prize. However, considering the statistics on the actual winners and the revelations regarding how they're chosen, it seems that your odds are infinitely better if your political beliefs align with Musk's.
Copyright © 2023 Powered by
Elon Musk's $1 million election giveaway has provoked a second lawsuit-寸地尺天网
sitemap
文章
1835
浏览
892
获赞
3
Holocaust denial is now banned on Facebook
Facebook is expanding its recent crackdown on dangerous conspiracy theories to include Holocaust denThese are the 10 best platforms for building a mobile app
If you've ever wanted to build an app after thinking up a brilliant idea, you're in the right place.Irish comedians abroad ask people to vote yes on their behalf in abortion referendum
Sharon Horgan and Aisling Bea have enlisted the help of fellow Irish comedians living abroad to askTrump slammed by Parkland survivors over tweet about Texas shooting
The United States experienced yet another tragic school shooting on Friday morning, after someone opTesting Reliability: Puget Systems' List of Tried and True PC Hardware
We've all been there. You want to buy a new graphics card, you read the reviews, and settle on the bGoogle Translate is generating ominous religious prophecies for some reason
Google Translate is, er, having some issues.For instance, if you open the tool, select Maori as theInstagram enables support for third party authenticator security apps
About time, Instagram.On Tuesday, Instagram announced several changes intended to improve security fYou won't believe what NYC's commute looked like on this rainy morning
The morning commute in New York City is never really easy, but with this morning's rain storm, the iTesting Reliability: Puget Systems' List of Tried and True PC Hardware
We've all been there. You want to buy a new graphics card, you read the reviews, and settle on the bHere's how to get verified on Instagram
Before Instagram rolled out the ability to request verification badges a couple years back, no one kTesla assures it's not anti
Finally, Tesla has a response. U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison, the head of the Democratic National CommitteTrump slammed by Parkland survivors over tweet about Texas shooting
The United States experienced yet another tragic school shooting on Friday morning, after someone opEverything you need to know about the OLED display rumored to be on the iPhone 12
In a normal year, Apple shows off its new line of iPhones in September. 2020 has been anything but nGoogle launches Android Pie for Pixel phones
The next version of Android is here and, once again, the name is exactly what most of us predicted:Google One officially launches with cheaper storage plans
In May this year, Google announced Google One, a rebranding of its Google Drive online storage servi